Motor vehicle laws, as they are known, are designed to protect public safety by regulating driving behavior. Fines promised violators of these laws, in principle, aim to dater as well as punish. Most individuals accept the practice of issuing a $100 summons to a driver caught zooming along a road where the law permits only half his speed.
However, there is much opposition to issuing a $450 ticket to motorists unable to present three pieces of legal paper at a police checkpoint because their wallets were left at home. How does a forgotten card put the public’s safety in jeopardy?
This matter raises another issue. When Mr. Minimum Wage, whose income goes to the care of his family, is required to pay the hefty $450 fine, there are depriving consequences. On the other hand, a similar sum imposed on Mr. Quite Wealthy causes no distress whatsoever.
Many interpretations have been assigned to the structure of our driving laws. Some assert that traffic fines are actually a tax in disguise— one, falling lopsidedly upon the unwealthy. Another view, also focusing on the area of impact, holds these words: the driving violations of poor adults are frequently paid from the sacrifices of children.
Wildwood Crest – Several of Donald Trump’s Cabinet picks have created quite a bit of controversy over the last few weeks. But surprisingly, his pick to become the next director of the FBI hasn’t experienced as much…
