Search
Close this search box.

Friday, September 20, 2024

Search

AG Challenges Federal Rule that Would Deny Protection to Most Central American Asylum-Seekers

OAG Logo

By Press Release

TRENTON – Attorney General Gurbir S. Grewal Oct. 15 joined a multi-state legal challenge to a Trump administration rule that prevents asylum-seekers from applying for humanitarian protection in the United States unless they have already sought asylum in a country they traveled through on their way to the U.S.
According to a release, the rule, if fully implemented, would effectively bar most asylum-seekers from Central American counties, including Honduras, El Salvador, and Guatemala.
Grewal and the other participating Attorneys General oppose the rule as an illegal ban on asylum-seekers, as economically harmful to the states, and as dangerous to families seeking protection at the U.S. border. 
With 5% of the country’s affirmative asylum grantees residing in New Jersey, the Garden State has the third-highest number of asylum grantees after California and New York.
“The United States has a long, proud and bipartisan tradition of protecting those who seek refuge from persecution,” stated Grewal. “The Trump Administration has little regard for that tradition—or for the federal laws that protect asylum-seekers. But if the federal government won’t stand up for those protections, we will.” 
In an amicus brief filed Oct. 15 with the U.S. Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals in California, the Attorneys General ask the court to uphold a prior, nationwide injunction that halted enforcement of the Administration’s so-called “Asylum Eligibility and Procedural Modifications” rule.
The nationwide injunction was issued last month by a U.S. District Court judge sitting in San Francisco. A subsequent U.S. Supreme Court ruling cleared the Administration to move ahead with implementation, on a provisional basis, while litigation over the rule’s lawfulness continued. Thes Ninth Circuit filing supports a lawsuit led by the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) that seeks to have the rule set aside.
In the brief aimed at continuing the nationwide injunction, the California-led coalition of Attorneys General argues that the new rule will harm states by increasing the number of would-be asylees entering the U.S. unlawfully, thereby denying those individuals a chance to work legally and contribute to state economies.
According to the brief, the new rule will ultimately trigger an increase in the total number of undocumented immigrants and will force many asylum-seeking adults and children into dangerous, trauma-inducing circumstances in pursuit of the protections they seek.

Spout Off

Dennisville – As a parent of a Tech student it would be great if the school would update their staff directory. So many old staff still listed and no new teachers listed. What gives?

Read More

Cape May County – The majority of the voters for the Middle and Dennis School bond DID NOT want such a large tax increase. Regardless of what Art Hall said or didn't say wasn't a deciding factor. I'm…

Read More

Fishing Creek – The theory must be if you drive faster on Fishing Creek Road, the pot hole you hit will be quicker. And if you are on a sinking boat, drill a hole to let the water out!

Read More

Most Read

Print Editions

Recommended Articles

Skip to content